Mar. 15, 2001 By Janelle Holden Journal staff writer It was standing room only at the Dolores Town Board meeting on Monday night. Most of the residents attending came for a public hearing concerning a proposed leash law for dogs. The council decided to table the leash law until the concerns of residents were who opposed it are researched and addressed. Seven residents spoke against the amended ordinance, and one spoke in support. Dolores resident Linda Robinson read a letter written by resident Marianne Mate with an attached petition signed by 25 citizens who opposed the law. "We all agree that dogs should not be running at large and that pet owners should be responsible for their pets. We encourage you to leave the law as it is now and give it at least six more months to see if the increase of fines and having an animal control officer on staff are taking care of the problem," the letter explained. The letter also asked the board to exclude Joe Rowell Park and Riverside Park from the leash law and the use of the existing law at these parks. The law would amend the current "Running at Large" ordinance, which classifies dogs at large as those not under the direct control of such owner by a leash, cord, chain, voice, or other command, to read, "A dog shall be deemed to be ‘running at large’ when it is off or away from the premises of its owner or is not under the direct control of such owner by a leash, cord or chain of no more than fifteen (15) feet in length. A dog shall be deemed to be running at large even in the presence of its owner if it is not restrained by proper leash as described herein." The current rate structure would stay in place, however. For dog owners with dogs caught at large and without a town license the first fine is $30, plus tax and court costs. The fines increase for each subsequent citation, but depending on the judge’s discretion dog owners can be fined up to $300 and sentenced to 90 days in jail. Ron Johnson said he supports the enactment of the leash law because he hasn’t seen any changes since Gary Hansen, the Dolores animal-control officer, was hired in November and fines were increased. "In my area there’s just as many dogs running loose as there ever was," said Johnson. "It doesn’t seem the increased fines have made much of an effect." Robert Meier had concerns that citizens were being "targeted" arbitrarily by town officials. He and his wife recently pleaded not guilty to a dog-at-large citation. "My concern is whether the leash law can be enforced legally and professionally," said Meier. Although Hansen was not at the meeting to take questions, residents asked the board to research whether increasing fines and hiring an animal-control officer has adequately addressed the problem. The town council conducted a survey last October. Of the 116 questionnaires returned, 62 percent of residents said they would like to "see a leash law in Dolores." In other council business:
In a Tuesday interview with the Journal, however, District Ranger Mike Znerold said the deal was only in its "formative stages," and could easily take five to 10 years to complete because not only would an act of Congress have to be passed to conduct the land swap, but Congress would also have to appropriate enough money for the Forest Service to build new headquarters to house its 80 employees at the industrial park. Znerold plans to attend the town’s next work session to discuss the land swap. |
Copyright © 2001 the Cortez Journal.
All rights reserved. |